• 0 Posts
  • 23 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: October 23rd, 2024

help-circle








  • The only possible achievable competition goal for US in AI is in building skynet. Boiling the oceans to obtain pure fascist oligarchist supremacy over Americans and pro Israel opinion in the world, far more than military targetting or weapons production supremacy advantages.

    There is zero chance long term of having the power infrastructure to support AI/datacenters in the US, and zero chance of extending AI into manufacturing dominance. China’s manufacturing supply chain, and abundance instead of tariff scarcity, makes it impossible for them to lose their edge to anyone unfriendly to China. Models that are less than 2 months, and closing, behind, and massive south east asia datacenter development that provides 90% of local frontier US model traffic consumed in China, makes US Oligarchism’s national security pretense a farce.

    US is collapsing late stage nazi colonial economy, and geopolitical AI is not even the last bastion to put all eggs in a basket for, it is a direct tool to pillage the US/colonies for oligarchy during accelerated collapse.


  • Hard to understand author’s point, but it is supposedly this:

    When someone is sick, lonely, or frightened, do we want a real person in the room, or will a bot do?13 Do we want our children taught and shaped mostly by people, or are we content to hand that to machines? When a court weighs whom to believe, or an employer whom to hire, do we want a person behind the call, or can a machine sort it?14 Do we want the systems that increasingly run our lives steered by a few private companies, or held more widely accountable? And do we want a shared world we can make sense of together, or one so flooded with synthetic stuff that no one can tell what is real?15 None of these can be answered by asking whether AI produces quality or slop. They are about the communal lives we want, and when we reach for “AI slop,” we’re sloppily pushing each other on exactly these questions without ever confronting them out loud.

    When we complain about an example of AI slop, we’re implicitly opining on all of those questions against over reliance on AI. Author is complaining that there are more dangerous/annoying aspects of AI overtaking decisions rather than content production.

    It seems innapropriate/unfocused to bring up discussion of those topics, with zero opinion/argument by author, framed as a distraction from not stating an opinion on slop.








  • toxic sludge is good for you

    This is perhaps obscure, but a reference to a famous PR book from the 1970s. Datacenter harm is mostly about electricity scarcity pricing for rest of US, noise and sometimes water use, and financial loss. There can be pollution/global warming associated concerns, but its not a major health care issue.

    stop treating oligarchs like they don’t have something to gain by supporting each other.

    This is indeed the core issue in America. Israel first rulership is part of the support circle, and much more so, since 2024.

    That $1B budget is unlikely to be TV advertisements for datacenters. It’s likely to be bribes that get all of the pre-election candidate opposition to projects go quiet after election.



  • After a human reviewer examined the statements, they were reported to police.

    The guardrails are working as intended. ONLY persecute the public with them. Government skynet, and bond villains will have access to non guardrailed models, or any “flagged for review” markers will be ignored to bomb more elementary schools. A sheriff’s office is government power related. School shootings is just a thoughts and prayers issue, if you’re confused about the line between this and other incidents/attitudes we are being spied on for.