Silicon Valley investors are doing everything they can to keep the AI bubble from bursting.

One of the freedoms of free software is that people can study it and use it however they want, for whatever purpose they want.

Given that Anthropic and OpenAI derive their profits from their models being closed source rather than open source, I don’t think they should be assisted in devouring freely-accessible data in their endeavor.

Not all developers may see it this way, but those contributing code to LLMs are training them for free at the expense of career opportunities for fellow developers, all the while Anthropic, OpenAI, and other AI companies rake in money for maintaining access to content that isn’t theirs.

It’s not free; doing so provides Anthropic with free access to training data for its models.

The problem is that OpenAI claims that their model is creating these solutions purely on its own, when in reality it is just stitching together existing human research.

The U.S. doesn’t need more hybrids, it needs electric cars that cut out oil dependency and a corresponding increase in renewable energy production.

Still just Natsume’s fake Harvest Moon.

Edit: What originally was ‘Harvest Moon’ has been ‘Story of Seasons’ since 2014. Natsume—the original publisher in North America and Europe—retained the localized ‘Harvest Moon’ brand name and has since released its own games in the style of the originals with the intent of profiting off the brand recognition for the original games.

The technology should still be improved as much as possible.

Not 40, but also don’t want my thoughts and comments to be an income stream for a for-profit organization, whether that be by selling my data for profit, training an LLM with my data, or contributing to an inescapable network effect that can be increasingly monetized by various means.

The modern social media platform is not designed to foster positive interactions, but rather to maximize shareholder value.

PS5 discs can store up to 100 GB.