• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    I’m on fully on team Fuck AI.

    but this does amuse me, that him and his team couldnt even prevent the very predictable.

    Its like how musk spent a year trying to make Grok suck his dick, and it still calls him a nazi loser.

    • Omgpwnies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      The problem for them is that to make a Large Language Model, is it needs to consume a large amount of language. Meaning, to get even a semblance of basic functionality - literally putting together a grammatically correct sentence - means it will need to consume many orders of magnitude more language examples than their right-wing bullshit mill has ever produced. It could consume the entirety of Fox News’ catalogue and not reach even a fraction of what most LLM models have been trained on.

      It’s currently impossible for an LLM to exist without having been trained on an absolute assload of progressive literature.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Q: What policies for work, health and environment help the most people and promotes a high quality of life index and freedom to try new work or care for loved ones, and why don’t they result in everyone quitting work? Is there enough wealth in the world to avoid artificial scarcity?

    I can help with official U.S. government services, benefits, and how-to information. I do not provide political commentary or economic analysis of policy choices.

    Lol fail

  • Mikina@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Please please I really hope they will force US companies to start calling their chatbots SI instead of AI, and forbid them from using the term AI.

    That would be such a funny PR/marketing nightmare. It’s such a cringe term :D

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I like the suggestion that they would include top secret documents in its training data. Although I wouldn’t be surprised from this administration.

  • eicker@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Trump calling it “Super Intelligence” only for the government’s own AI to contradict his election claims is almost too perfect. Apparently even a chatbot trained under his administration looked at the evidence and said: nope. Then came the inevitable upgrade: stop answering political questions before the machine commits any more inconvenient acts of fact checking.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Trump’s reaction was probably something along the lines of “shut up stupid piggy, you are stupid and fake, also ugly. I am going to call you pig intelligence from now on.”

  • EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    This is why I’ll never believe the claim that AI will save humanity. It may well give the answers to “save us” but we already know the answer. We just don’t care. We’re not going to listen to AI if we don’t listen to ourselves.

    • NotAnOtter@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      It’s a language calculator. It has no intrinsic incentive to tell the truth, it just processes words.

      There is no reason to trust AI’s reasoning on what could “save us” even if it offered one.

  • Isbjerg@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think a new name would be better; North American Super Intelligence in short NASI.