They are advocating/representing, not testifying. A defense attorney does not make statements of fact, they call witnesses and experts for that. They introduce reasonable doubt.
They call witnesses and experts to present facts and other testomony which is why they are under oath.
This is the pretext for taking away individual’s rights to general computing
No it isn’t.
There is zero chance that there is a reduction in child abuse by these evil fucks because they get the kick out of the abuse part.
They locked her up and gave her a puppy.
What did we have before the wooden spear that the wooden spear was a derivative of?
What’s the best TLD for rapists and nazis?
.gov
They are still able to be held accoubtable for breaking ethincs, and in my opinion they should be disbarred for presenting AI hallucinations and any other evidence they haven’t spent any time verifying.