Yes, your tone. You’re coming off as snide and hostile, not to mention condescending, none of which are conducive to discourse.
It makes it seem like you’re not interested in communicating your perspective or finding a common understanding. But with those two motivations ruled out, what’s left?
What is your motivation here?
You’re implying a lot (and incorrectly), and your tone just makes me sad for you. Is this a pathos thing? What’s your goal here?
I think principles are a pretty darn good reason not to engage with a thing.
There is literally no possible way you don’t know how big a raging transphobe Rowling is, and if you’ve gotten this far in the conversation, that ignorance can only deliberate.
She has though literally written what, two books where the villain is an evil cackling trans murderer?
It in fact affects every aspect of her life, her media included
You can also confirm these things trivially easy and ohhh I get it now, you’re a troll. Congratulations, I fell for it too.
Fuck. We really need more variety in the web browser space too.
I’ve got to be honest, I’m completely baffled about this pearl-clutching thing. I’d ask if you were mistaking me for someone else in the reply chain but I haven’t seen any pearl-clutching there either, much less victimization or giving shit.
The “kid” part, too, perhaps points to some projection on your part? I think you’ve been reading a whole lot of things that just aren’t present.
I can’t say I’m disappointed by the block. This discussion hasn’t been very enlightening or enjoyable.