You joke, but I run localized AI on my cell phone. The game looks very graphically simple, so really, it shouldn’t be too demanding for a smaller AI data set to respond fast enough.

All the AI companies know it. The first to get caught out about it will stand to lose the most funding.

What makes you think that the demo just got massively more popular than expected? This is probably an occam’s razor type of thing.

I’m more curious about how they were planning on structuring the full game to make a profit. Hopefully they’re just planning on using a client side ai, but that would likely make the demo somewhat deceitful.

That’s pretty insane and awesome. I’m surprised I missed this. I love “driving 4 answers”. That guy is awesome.

A plug in hybrid and for a certain distance, I’d presume. You can’t really get 104mpg on a highway with a normal hybrid. I at least can’t really imagine it exists.

Yes. It affirms that there’s a bunch of fan boys in here that are parroting off what they heard from other fan boys and that there is nothing from valve saying they needed the same spec to make a streaming only system work.

But that would have been in response to non streaming, where the headset handles everything. I’m talking about non streaming.

Several people around here keep claiming valve said the hardware in it was pretty much the same hardware needed for a streaming only design, but no one has actually been able to provide a source of them saying it, and it sounds like BS in a rumor mill at this point. Especially because it doesn’t make any sense.

*Edit: See. Silent downvotes and no links of anyone from valve claiming that pretty much these specs were required for a streaming only system.

Where do they say this? I don’t know why that much ram and processing and storage would be required for just the streaming and fov stuff.