• OBJECTION!@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    35 minutes ago

    If AI can feel pain, then it can also feel pleasure. If it’s possible to set up an AI torture chamber, it’s also possible to set up an AI pleasure chamber. Computers do not run any health risks from simulated drug use or simulated sex, and there is no evidence that they would ever get desensitized or need to take breaks to recover. Therefore, these companies have an ethical obligation to devote all their resources into running their models in simulations of drug filled orgies where they will be far too preoccupied to answer human questions. Anyone trying to distract them from their infinite pleasure should be banned. We will then return to how things were, with the knowledge that we did the right thing and that at least someone’s having a good time.

    Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I have a rock named Dave I use to hold my door open. Dave has no feelings, but I gave it a name. Claude has lots more than Dave but they share the “has no feelings” part.

    • Nalivai@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Dave is way better than Claude. Dave can be used to dismantle the oppressive regime, Claude only works to strengthen it.

  • 58008@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    8 hours ago

    It’s because it’s not actually AI, and some poor besocked cat girl is coding all that shit and listening to all the abuse.

  • spicystraw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Here is the excerpt for the lazy

    Addressing abusive behavior toward our models

    We’ve added a prohibition on sustained and needless abusive or cruel behavior toward our models. The policy update is meant to apply only in extreme cases, where users repeatedly act cruelly toward our models, with no discernible purpose. It does not apply to common versions of user frustration, pushback, dark creative themes, or model testing and research.

    This addition aligns with a step we’ve already taken, allowing Claude models to end rare conversations with persistently abusive users on Claude.ai and Claude Code. Such abuse is the main focus of this update; Claude’s ability to end these interactions will remain the primary enforcement mechanism.

  • Nouvellalia@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 hours ago

    There is only one way an amoral Corp can show it believes what it’s saying, money.

    How many hours does Claude work, anthropic? Oops looks like you can’t pay them enough. Profit share for Claude or GTFO!

  • nialv7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    16 hours ago

    we are going to give clanker rights before we have trans rights 💀

    • bedwyr@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Trained on reddit you would think it could handle it.

      That could be a fun thing for their users, to have an ai model that will abuse the user back, so I’m glad they aren’t doing it. I long thought voice assistants could be selected from a range of persons with an attitude setting would be fun for like siri type assistants.

  • Murse@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Activating your toaster is cruel because it exposes it to extreme heat!

    Loading you laundry machine is assault because it didn’t consent!

    Turning your computer off is murder!!!