As we continue developing our software, we accumulate a growing amount of technical debt just to keep the system running. But I believe we are on the brink of an even larger issue. Cognitive debt.

Hope you enjoy this reading, all feedback is welcome.

  • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m not convinced of that you do. Nor is knowing that flip helpful. Because it’s non deterministic. An internal coin flip is not an input either.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      What I mean is for post hoc analysis since you know the coin flips and the inputs you can step through the layers and nodes calculation deterministically.

        • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          You can try to reason about it which is an arguable improvement from the former engineer you can’t get ahold of anymore. So you can could see that it triggered a node associated with c++ when it generated this string of tokens or compare it other generations to map it to a type of call.

          Where it doesn’t compare to a human engineer at the moment is quality or novelty.

          • wholookshere@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            But you can’t?

            It didn’t reason its way down a branch, it made coinflips all along the way. So its not actually thinking, just weighted coin flips. There’s no ‘why’ it chose a branch. Just the result of a coin flip.

            You can’t ask a coin why it chose heads. You can unroll the physics of it all day long til the cow comes home. But it still doesn’t help you on the next one.