AI can speed up a lot of the manual labour needed to bring even an almost dead, 10-year-old device back to life. My Xiaomi Mi Max 2 (oxygen, MSM8953) was dead. With AI help and my own knowledge, I ported/rewrote the missing drivers, and it now runs Nura (postmarketOS) with working camera, torch, SIM, phone calls and SMS. Only the loudspeaker is still broken.

Everything is up for anyone who wants to install it, or to understand the changes and manually write the patches for mainline: https://github.com/sv1sjp/mi-max2-oxygen-msm8953-nura-drivers Testing, feedback and PRs welcome.

  • Ptsf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    So is manufacturing new electronics. You don’t get a perfect solution, and frankly, local ai already exists that’s good enough for this type of prototyping. I’ve read through their reasoning and while I can sympathize, I do not agree with it. It’s not realistic or accomplishing their goals imo, but I maintain that’s the beauty of open source. Fork it. Move on. Thank them for their contribution.

    • erebion@news.erebion.eu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yes, new electronics are part of the problem, that’s why the community brings Linux to old phones.

      • Ptsf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Except it doesn’t bring it to all old phones, ai can massively help resolve this.

        • erebion@news.erebion.eu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Buying a used phone that is already at least somewhat supported is better than slop-coding another phone and wasting resources in the process and then others having to clean up the code that nobody actually understands.

          • Ptsf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I don’t subscribe to your personal purity tests or agree with the logic on that one. The resources involved can be minimal, and I don’t really believe you have a ton of exposure to software engineering if you think all of the prototype code will need cleaned up or be entirely understood, especially with devices like these. There are significant amounts of binary blobs and drivers filled with post compiled obfuscated closed source code that nobody maintains or understands even in current Nura distributions, it’s a design of ip protections popular hardware manufacturers use and nothing guarantees the quality or maintainability of that code. Just because you don’t like or know how to use a tool does not invalidate it, and there’s no reason for you to apply genuine concerns to a tools entire existence or output.

            • erebion@news.erebion.eu
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              9 hours ago

              no reason for you to apply genuine concerns

              What? The issues by which I’m concerned are reason enough to be concerned.