I had a report for AI slop today. 1m LOC in 3 months. How do you even modify and distribute that? I do not think we had a rule against it.

IMHO if we allow, the community gets drowned out by AI vomit and it is harder to see handcrafted loved projects that are easy to modify and distribute.

My mind is to ban it to preserve open source.

Are folk in agreememt with this line? Would love to hear your thoughts.

  • _hovi_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah I don’t think we need slop projects being posted here. I know a lot of people are using these tools even for personal projects nowadays but tbh I’m not really interested in exploring any project heavily written by AI.

        • Bazoogle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          14 days ago
          • someone with zero experience using AI to blindly create something barely functional, feeding in errors until it gets a working version. No checking for vulnerabilities, testing, error catching, no thought on architecture or scalability.
          • someone carefully using AI in a controlled manner to create open source software. They spend days making sure that is reliable, scalable, secure, and that the project is quality.

          You believe these two are them same? That both are equal slop? Quite frankly, I don’t care if an AI made most of the code for an open source project as long as it is made well, and allows me to get away from awful proprietary alternatives. If the output of an AI is distinguishable from a quality programmer, idk how that is also slop.

          • _hovi_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 days ago

            There’s some nuance for sure, but personally I’m a lot less interested in heavily LLM-programmed projects

  • Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    This was a problem in [email protected] and they’ve done a good job of dealing with it. You could take a look at that past discussion to see what worked / what didn’t.

    IMO there is an organized effort behind some of these new accounts pushing AI projects, and you need to deal with it in some form to stop them from coming

    • urushitan 漆たん@kakera.kintsugi.moe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Agreed. TLDR, you must tag posts there with the following:

      Post Tagging

      There are three types of tags for project promotional / AI posts.

      • [CBH] - Code By Human - A project promotional post with a project that did not use AI in any capacity. No disclosure necessary.
      • [AIP] - AI Project - A project promotional post with a project that used AI in development in any capacity. Disclosure is required for how it was used.
      • [AIT] - AI Topic - A discussion topic that includes AI. This may be for a discussion on hardware to self-host on, llama.cpp vs ollama, your experience using vulkan, etc.