• lazynooblet@lazysoci.al
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      Prior to this going live there was a lot of talk about how congestion will simply move from one place to another. I don’t know new york so can’t name places but it was regarding commuters using a street or bridge that is now under congestion charge so they will flow an alternative route through roads that aren’t designed for the additional traffic.

      Is that now the case?

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 years ago

        Some people may be inclined to go up and over Central Park to get to the other side without paying the $9. That likely only affects uptown residents. I can’t imagine anyone driving around the park from midtown to avoid the fee.

        The only legitimate concerns I’ve read are from contractors with tools and small businesses who deliver. They should be offered exceptions if walking or mass transit are unrealistic options. You’re not riding the subway with acetylene tanks or delivering fresh meat on Metro North. Other than that, I love it.

  • thr0w4w4y2@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 years ago

    inb4 the supreme court rules that congestion charging is unconstitutional and furthermore that public transport, too, is unconstitutional.