• mushroommunk@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    No, it’s a first pass filter. People against AI like myself know it’s a publisher declared thing but that’s still hundreds of results less I’d have to filter through. No virus scanner promises 100% accuracy, it promises to be part of a solution that still requires user diligence

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the issue with such Ai filter. Its useless if we have to trust publishers tag it correctly. If they do this ai slop, do you trust them doing that? It will bring false security for users trusting the filter would work correctly.

      • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        There will never be a perfect system. Already users rely on the AI tag on Steam, why not just make it easier to exclude those?

        You’re letting perfection be the enemy of progress. You will never outsmart the most malicious dev or the laziest user. Ever. What you can do is make progress, take in feedback of how that improved things and where it still fails, and then make more progress.

        • dreamkeeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Nah he’s right. If you add an AI filter then companies will just stop tagging their games as AI generated. It’s not a matter of anyone outsmarting anyone else it’s just common sense. There wouldn’t be any progress here, we would actually make things worse.

          Steam needs to do something on their own, or crowd source it somehow. But they’ll never do that. They don’t even review games for quality level as it is.