We’ve been getting a lot of AI coded submissions recently, as well as lots of reports asking to remove them.

Should we remove these posts, or not?

  • HaraldvonBlauzahn@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    19 hours ago

    How about making a rule that it is at least six months old and in continued development? This would filter out most slop.

    • lasagnaisland@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      agreed. i think metrics like this are much more practical and useful:

      • age of project
      • number of stars (not great, but can help show overall interest)
      • number of versions/updates
      • activiely maintained

      if an amazing, maintained tool uses AI, that’s a lot different than a one-night project that’s never been tested and will be abandoned in a week