We’ve been getting a lot of AI coded submissions recently, as well as lots of reports asking to remove them.

Should we remove these posts, or not?

  • WardPearce@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    95
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    AI slop & AI code is very different. If its just pure vibe coded slop with no oversight or effort, then sure its just junk, remove it.

    But a lot of experienced developers now use AI tooling to increase productivity, just because AI was used in the process should be consider it slop?

    • JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The self-hosted community has a very good take in my opinion. Especially facing the fact that new slop vaporware often comes with new accounts that just advertise the “product”.

      Disclosure about AI use, account minimums, and mods having discretion to ban obvious junk spam.

    • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      Agreed. Needs to be disclosed in the title of the post as having AI involvement, and show signs of active maintenance. Anyone can now oneshot some slop that’s nothing but a waste of our time, but it takes good developers to maintain, secure and expand.

      5 days old, nope, hasn’t been touched in months, nope. Dozens of active human participants, and/or a reasonable history of active development and to a lesser degree stars or equivalent, sure.

      It’s a bit more work for a poster, but I think it can keep quality high for project posts. Should be voted on by the community and made a rule.